This is new, and the basic TeX packages currently transition their files to the new place.
Of course this is only a problem if the file is needed in the configure phase. If it is needed only at runtime, a README file to instruct the local admin should be sufficient.
A wishlist bug on the shadowing package, blocked by an other wishlist bug on the basic TeX package, can help tracking these issues.
This allows users to say texdoc packagename directly. Otherwise they will first have to find the right command line (e.g. texdoc packagename/user.dvi) using texdoc -s keyword
Note that in texmf.cnf
, as well as in the sequence of multiple
texmf.cnf
files that are read, earlier entries override later
ones.
The Debian TeX sub-policy
generated from $Id: Debian-TeX-Policy.sgml 442 2005-12-29 18:51:51Z frank $debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org