Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)
-----------------------------------------

 Charter
 Last Modified: 2010-09-28

 Current Status: Active Working Group

 Chair(s):
     Mark Nottingham  <mnot@pobox.com>

 Applications Area Director(s):
     Alexey Melnikov  <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
     Peter Saint-Andre  <stpeter@stpeter.im>

 Applications Area Advisor:
     Alexey Melnikov  <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>

 Mailing Lists: 
     General Discussion:ietf-http-wg@w3.org
     To Subscribe:      ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
         In Body:       subscribe
     Archive:           http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/

Description of Working Group:

HTTP is one of the most successful and widely-used protocols on the 
Internet today. However, its specification has several editorial issues. 
Additionally, after years of implementation and extension, several 
ambiguities have become evident, impairing interoperability and the 
ability to easily implement and use HTTP.

The working group will refine RFC2616 to:
* Incorporate errata and updates (e.g., references, IANA registries, 
  ABNF)
* Fix editorial problems which have led to misunderstandings of the 
  specification
* Clarify conformance requirements
* Remove known ambiguities where they affect interoperability
* Clarify existing methods of extensibility
* Remove or deprecate those features that are not widely implemented and 
  also unduly affect interoperability
* Where necessary, add implementation advice
* Document the security properties of HTTP and its associated mechanisms 
  (e.g., Basic and Digest authentication, cookies, TLS) for common 
  applications

It will also incorporate the generic authentication framework from RFC 
2617, without obsoleting or updating that specification's definition of 
the Basic and Digest schemes.

Finally, it will incorporate relevant portions of RFC 2817 (in 
particular, the CONNECT method and advice on the use of Upgrade), so 
that that specification can be moved to Historic status.

In doing so, it should consider:
* Implementer experience
* Demonstrated use of HTTP
* Impact on existing implementations and deployments

The Working Group must not introduce a new version of HTTP and should 
not add new functionality to HTTP. The WG is not tasked with producing 
new methods, headers, or extension mechanisms, but may introduce new 
protocol elements if necessary as part of revising existing 
functionality which has proven to be problematic.

The Working Group's specification deliverables are:
* A document (or set of documents) that is suitable to supersede RFC 
  2616 and move RFC 2817 to Historic status
* A document cataloguing the security properties of HTTP

 Goals and Milestones:

   Done         First HTTP Revision Internet Draft 

   Done         First HTTP Security Properties Internet Draft 

   Nov 2010       Request Last Call for HTTP Revision 

   Nov 2010       Request Last Call for HTTP Security Properties 

   Apr 2011       Submit HTTP Revision to IESG for consideration as a Draft 
                Standard 

   Apr 2011       Submit HTTP Security Properties to IESG for consideration as 
                Informational 


 Internet-Drafts:

Posted Revised         I-D Title   <Filename>
------ ------- --------------------------------------------
Dec 2007 Oct 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-12.txt>
                HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing 

Dec 2007 Oct 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-12.txt>
                HTTP/1.1, part 7: Authentication 

Dec 2007 Oct 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-12.txt>
                HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching 

Dec 2007 Oct 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-12.txt>
                HTTP/1.1, part 5: Range Requests and Partial Responses 

Dec 2007 Oct 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-12.txt>
                HTTP/1.1, part 4: Conditional Requests 

Dec 2007 Oct 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-12.txt>
                HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation 

Dec 2007 Oct 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-12.txt>
                HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics 

Aug 2008 Jul 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-04.txt>
                Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Method Registrations 

Sep 2010 Nov 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-04.txt>
                Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext 
                Transfer Protocol (HTTP) 

Nov 2010 Nov 2010   <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-00.txt>
                Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Authentication 
                Scheme Registrations 

 Request For Comments:

  None to date.